Personal Injury

NY Dog Bite Law After Flanders v. Goodfellow: The Three Paths to Recovery

by Madison Law Firm PLLC May 24, 2026 9 min read
Legal Disclaimer — Read First

This article describes how New York dog bite law generally works. It is for general educational purposes only, is not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship with Madison Law Firm PLLC or CallCuz.com. Dog bite cases are highly fact-specific — outcomes depend on the dog's history, the owner's knowledge, where the bite occurred, and other details a general article cannot evaluate. Recent appellate decisions have changed parts of this area of law, and further changes are likely. If you have been bitten or attacked by a dog, speak with a licensed attorney before the three-year statute of limitations runs. Madison Law Firm PLLC makes no warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of the information presented and disclaims liability for errors or omissions to the fullest extent permitted by law.

TL;DR

Dog bite law in New York changed in 2025. The New York Court of Appeals decision in Flanders v. Goodfellow added a third path for injured plaintiffs to recover damages from dog owners.

You now have three potential ways to recover:

(1) Statutory strict liability for medical costs under Agriculture and Markets Law §123, if the dog is adjudicated "dangerous." (2) Common-law strict liability for all damages (medical, pain and suffering, lost wages) if the owner knew or should have known the dog had vicious propensities. (3) Negligence — new since Flanders — if the owner failed to exercise reasonable care, even if the dog had no documented prior history.

Three-year statute of limitations applies to personal injury claims. The owner's homeowner's, renter's, or landlord's insurance usually pays.

For decades, New York was an outlier among U.S. states for dog bite cases. Most states impose strict liability on dog owners — meaning the owner is liable for any injuries the dog causes, period. New York instead limited injured plaintiffs almost entirely to a strict liability theory rooted in the dog's "vicious propensities" and the owner's knowledge of them. If you could not prove the dog had bitten or attacked before, your case usually failed.

That changed in 2025. The Court of Appeals — New York's highest court — decided Flanders v. Goodfellow and added a negligence path to dog bite cases. The framework now has three layers, and understanding which one applies to your case determines what damages you can recover and what evidence you need to gather.

Path 1: Statutory Strict Liability for Medical Costs — Agriculture & Markets Law §123

Path 1 · Statute

Strict Liability for Medical Costs Only

If a court has adjudicated a dog to be "dangerous" under New York Agriculture and Markets Law §123, the owner is strictly liable for medical and veterinary costs caused by the dog — regardless of the owner's knowledge or precautions.

Section 123 of the Agriculture and Markets Law lets a court declare a dog "dangerous" based on its conduct. Once that adjudication is in place, the owner becomes strictly liable for the medical costs of any subsequent injury the dog causes to a person, companion animal, farm animal, or domestic animal.

The limitation: this statutory strict liability covers medical costs only — it does not, by itself, give you pain and suffering, lost wages, or emotional distress damages. For those, you need Path 2 or Path 3.

Path 2: Common-Law Strict Liability — Vicious Propensities

Path 2 · Common Law

Full Damages If You Can Prove the Owner Knew the Dog Was Dangerous

If you can show the dog had "vicious propensities" and the owner knew or should have known about them, you can recover all your damages — medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, scarring, emotional distress.

For more than a century, this was effectively the only path for New York dog bite plaintiffs. It is still important, because it lets you recover the full range of damages — not just medical costs. But it has historically been hard to win because it requires evidence of what the owner knew.

What counts as a "vicious propensity"? Courts look at the dog's prior behavior — not just prior bites. Growling, lunging, baring teeth, attacking other animals, having been confined behind "beware of dog" signs or muzzled in public — all of these can be evidence of vicious propensities. After Flanders, the Court of Appeals confirmed that vicious propensities can be established without proof of a prior bite when other behavior would have put a reasonable owner on notice.

What counts as owner "knowledge"? Either actual knowledge (the owner saw the behavior) or constructive knowledge (the behavior was such that a reasonable owner would have known). Witness testimony, neighbor complaints, vet records, prior incident reports — all of these can establish knowledge.

Path 3 (New in 2025): Negligence — Flanders v. Goodfellow

Path 3 · 2025 Court of Appeals

Negligence — No Prior Bite Required

If the owner failed to exercise reasonable care and that failure caused the injury, you can recover damages — even if there is no documented history of vicious propensities. This is the path Flanders opened in 2025.

This is the change that matters most. Under Flanders, an injured plaintiff can now pursue an ordinary negligence claim against a dog owner. The question is no longer "did the dog have vicious propensities and did the owner know?" — it is the more general "did the owner act with reasonable care under the circumstances?"

Examples of negligent conduct that might give rise to a claim under Path 3:

Negligence claims allow recovery of the full range of damages — medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, scarring, emotional distress — just like Path 2. The advantage of Path 3 is that it does not require evidence of vicious propensities. The trade-off is that comparative negligence applies: if the injured person did something to contribute to the incident (provoking the dog, ignoring a warning), the recovery may be reduced proportionally. That was not a factor under the old strict liability framework, but it is under Flanders.

Who Pays the Damages

In the overwhelming majority of New York dog bite cases, the injured person is not pursuing the owner's personal assets — the case is paid by an insurance policy. The most common sources of recovery are:

The 3-Year Deadline

New York's statute of limitations for personal injury is three years from the date of the injury, under CPLR §214(5). That deadline applies to dog bite claims under any of the three paths. If the injured person is a minor, the clock is generally paused until they turn 18 — but for any potential claim against the parents' homeowner's insurance, prompt notification is required by the policy terms, so do not wait.

What You Should Do — Right Now

  1. Get medical care immediately. Dog bites carry a high infection risk, and tetanus, rabies, and bacterial infections are real concerns. The medical record from the day of the bite is the foundation of your claim.
  2. Photograph the wounds. Photographs from the day of the bite, again after 48-72 hours (when bruising peaks), and then weekly as healing progresses. Scarring evidence matters.
  3. Report the bite to NYC Department of Health. NYC requires bite reports — this triggers rabies follow-up and creates an official record of the incident.
  4. Identify the dog and owner. Get the owner's name, address, phone, the dog's name and breed, the dog's vaccination status (important for both medical reasons and your claim), and any homeowner's or renter's insurance information.
  5. Photograph the location. Where the bite happened — was the dog leashed? Was there a fence? Was there a "beware of dog" sign? Was the dog on or off the owner's property? All of this matters.
  6. Identify witnesses. Names and phone numbers of anyone who saw the bite or knew the dog beforehand.
  7. Preserve evidence of vicious propensities, if any. If the dog had bitten before, growled at people in the neighborhood, was kept behind a "beware of dog" sign, or had any documented history — gather that evidence early. After Flanders, you can pursue a negligence claim even without it, but it strengthens the case substantially.
  8. Do not give a recorded statement to the owner's insurance carrier without speaking to an attorney. What you say in an early recorded statement can be used to reduce or deny your claim later.

What Dog Bite Cases Are Worth

There is no formula. Dog bite damages depend on the severity of the injury (puncture vs. tearing vs. crush), location (face and hands command higher value because of visible scarring and functional impact), permanent scarring, medical treatment required (sutures, surgery, reconstructive procedures), psychological impact (especially in children), lost wages, and the limits of the available insurance policy.

One reality worth noting: New York's average dog bite claim cost is reported to run roughly 40 percent above the national average. Cases involving children, facial wounds, or permanent disfigurement frequently produce six-figure recoveries. Minor puncture wounds with full healing may settle in the low five figures. The strength of the liability theory available (Path 1 vs. 2 vs. 3) also affects value.

When to Call Us

The sooner the better. Evidence of the dog's history gets harder to gather over time — witnesses move, memories fade, the dog can be quietly euthanized or relocated. The 3-year statute of limitations also runs from the date of the bite, not the date you discovered the dog had bitten before.

Madison Law Firm PLLC handles New York dog bite cases on a contingency basis — no fee unless we recover. Your immigration status does not affect your ability to bring a claim. The conversation is confidential. Call (212) 300-3191 or use the form on our homepage.

Bitten by a Dog?

The 2025 Flanders decision opened a new path to recovery. Talk to us before the statute of limitations runs — free, confidential, no fee unless we win.

Call (212) 300-3191
No Legal Advice / Errors and Omissions

The content of this article is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice on any specific matter. The information may not reflect the most current legal developments. Madison Law Firm PLLC and CallCuz.com expressly disclaim all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the content of this article, and disclaim any and all liability for any errors, inaccuracies, or omissions herein. Use of this article does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Madison Law Firm PLLC. No statement on this page should be construed as a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of any legal matter. Dog bite law in New York is in a period of active development following Flanders v. Goodfellow (2025), and the interpretation of that decision continues to evolve in lower courts.

Madison Law Firm PLLC attorneys are licensed to practice in the State of New York. For matters arising outside New York, we partner with attorneys licensed in the relevant jurisdiction to handle local filings — with full written client disclosure of the arrangement. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.